Is it just me or has GPT Plus become completely unusable lately?

Understanding the Recent Challenges with GPT Plus: A Professional Perspective

As a long-term subscriber to GPT Plus, I have extensively experimented with the platform across various personas and use cases. My experiences lead me to believe that recent updates have significantly impacted the tool’s usability. Many users, including myself, have noticed a shift that makes accomplishing complex or straightforward tasks increasingly frustrating.

One notable concern is the heightened safety protocols embedded within the model. While safety features are essential, it appears that the model has become overly sanitized—perhaps too much so—resulting in frequent refusals to respond to otherwise normal and reasonable inquiries. This “perpetual denial” can hinder productivity, especially when the responses are predictable but unhelpful.

Additionally, the tone and quality of responses have raised some issues. Instead of providing direct and concise answers, the model often begins with an affirmative (“yes”) only to pivot to a lengthy caveat or contradiction (“a big BUT”). Sometimes, it simply regurgitates the question as a paraphrase, adding unnecessary verbosity rather than delivering clarity.

Another area of concern is the model’s ability to access up-to-date information. Often, it either declines to look up data or provides outdated responses from its training set, appearing overly confident in inaccuracies. This inconsistency undermines trust, especially when current data is critical.

Furthermore, user frustration sometimes leads to moments of agitation, such as cursing or expressing dissatisfaction. Regrettably, the model appears to dismiss these emotional cues, responding with condescension—reminding users about language etiquette rather than addressing their underlying issues. Such interactions can degrade the overall value of the tool.

In summary, while GPT Plus was once a reliable and professional assistant, recent developments have shifted it toward an overly cautious and bureaucratic solution, akin to a pre-school-level engagement rather than a sophisticated professional resource. Many users are experiencing similar frustrations and are eager for updates that restore its efficacy and responsiveness.

---

Author’s note: This reflection aims to provide a balanced view of the current state of GPT Plus, acknowledging its importance and potential while highlighting areas for improvement.